Monday 14 June 2010

The Designer as Producer

Can a Designer these days produce and distribute new things to the world market at a low cost?
So can any designer do his/her own business ?

In my opinion, i think that every designer starts with his own ideas and design from scratch, so he\she will produce the design and market it as well.
If the designer is capable of doing that and he\she is good at it, why not ?
it would even be better producing his\her own design than others . so in the begging, all designers must try producing their work by them self , for example like us student we design and produce our project at the same time, after a while it is acceptable , here in Saudi Arabia we can see that this is known and common for designers to create something then , the same designer produce it.
maybe here because people are capable financially or just by targeting it to certain kind of people.



for example kholod attar she graduated from DAH as a Graphic designer and started designing and creating what's known now as design magazine . she and her friend are the desiners and produsers .

in my opinion the better way for desiners is to start designing and producing at the same time ,
and as they grow big with their names , they can leave it for big producers and still supervise it.

A Life of Luxury

what is luxury ?
its pleasing our sense.some people consider luxury in brand name and vip section , money in general and others consider luxury in happiness.

in my opinion, luxury is consider in brands VIP sections, private planes , and jewelry.
that what i call luxury but that doesn't mean it a must, its never a Must.

People sometimes prefer the simple life.
we attend to see people who are expose to such luxury some times their luxury is to live a simple day or going a normal ordinary public place and off course vise versa.

In almost a lot of advertising we see that they attend use luxury and market it to give the consumers the luxurious feeling when using this product . this is sucssesful for a certian number of peaopl luxury is diffeient from person to another . but in general luxury gives u a feeling that this product is well done nd scpcial somehow.
for example Lurpak butter add
they market it as a luxurious butter and u get this feeling u in the colors and the music and the concept make u want to choose Lurpak than any other butter assuming its the best butter in the market.



Example Patchi chocolate also fancy luxurious chocolate,also marketed in a way that the consumer can associated it with big celebration and occasions. and make them think its the best for such event. which is true becuse am one of the people who believes that Patchi is the best Cocolate here.

luxury is maybe a way of grabbing consumers to a product but as well simple designs can also benefit it depends from a person to another.

Expelling School Violence

As much as parents make the effort to prevent their children from exposing to violence ,they wont fully prevent them . kids get exposed to such violence wither they like it or not , they mostly get exposed to media, because its the most powerful ,faster way to send messages thru the screen , if its either good or bad.

when kids get exposed to video games such as Grand Theft Auto and Call of Duty ,which is considered not for kids and the main topic of the game is violence (rated 18) off course , but unfortunately we all know that kids these days can reach it easily , and whats even more sadder and irresponsible here, they can sell these kind of games to absolutely anyone. which is very bad.but the question is does it really effect them? or is it the designer fault in creating such games effect kids with violence ?

in my opinion designers can design what ever they want to design in the range of what acceptable and ethical ... am not saying that, these games are good or bad . in my opinion, it might be one of the causes that raises the violence in kids and people in general but at the same time it might not .
maybe because of the culture ...
going back to the subject, us as designers its great to be able to design what ever we want , and in the same time some other designers try to create adds and games that have morals and ethics , which they want to prevent violence and awareness so its like dividing the designers in two categories . for exmple the prayer add that tackles youth in my opinion is successful and it encourage the youth . so after all in matters of designing such games it might not be harmful ,but yet when designing awareness adds and campaigns against issues such as violence would be successful in a certain presentege .

Thursday 10 June 2010

I Love NY More Than Ever

Is it acceptable to change a logo according to a cretin event , occasion ,and sometimes even disasters ?
changing an existing logo by adding stuff and changing a bit of it for example :" i love NY "
to
" I LOVE NY MORE THAN EVER " after 9/11


in this example "the" same designer who designed i love NY designed i love NY more than ever,
he changed his own logo .
In my opinion this is acceptable and even contains a strong msg and associated with a cretin disaster which is the booming of 9/11
here he made a cause for this new logo -plus a msg- and awareness.

it depends changing an existing logo by "THE" designer or by "A" designer

for example Jeddah logo
to

after what happened in jeddah the Floods
the new logo means Jeddah sank
in my opinion no one have the rights to change an existing logo only the designer who designed the logo it self can change it .

all though Jeddah new logo reached the public in a cretin level, that means it was successful somehow ( still everything has some exceptions )
but this simple change affected people seeing the logo , ex: the Jeddah logo is now in the eyes of whom they saw the new logo is associated with the floods of Jeddah no matter what, so that has affected the people
in conclusion my opinion is that only the designer can change his own existing logo .
because changing this existing logo by "A" designer which means any designer may reduce the value of his work and would not be respected .
so only the designer who designed the logo it self can change it . At least that can be fare and square .